Key Takeaways
AutoRFP.ai: Best for teams wanting AI-native automation that eliminates manual library maintenance through real-time content learning.
Responsive: Best for established enterprises with distributed teams needing robust collaboration features and unlimited content storage.
Qvidian: Best for financial services customers needing affordable proposal automation with automated review workflows.
AutogenAI: Best for construction and non-profit companies creating long-form proposals and tenders.
Ombud: Best for enterprise-level RevOps teams seeking AI-powered RFP automation with strong import/export features.
Loopio boasts a whopping 4.7 stars on G2, but a closer look into reviews reveal overpromised features, clunky imports, and limited language support.
If you’re an existing customer looking to switch or an interested prospect, this deep dive into Loopio alternatives (based on hands-on research and real customer feedback) will point you toward a better fit.
Name | Best for | Stand Out Feature | Price Starting Point |
AutoRFP.ai | Enterprise-SaaS focused companies seeking AI-powered efficiency and time savings | AI response engine | $899/month |
Responsive | Mid to large companies needing a reputable software | Content library | Not publicly available |
Qvidian | Financial services customers | AutoFill | Not publicly available |
AutogenAI | Generating response for long-form proposals | Research assistant | Not publicly available |
Ombud | Enterprise-level RevOps teams | OmMatch | Not publicly available |
AutoRFP.ai is an AI-native RFP platform designed to help its users win more bids with faster, higher-quality responses.
Unlike Loopio (a legacy tool with AI later bolted on), AutoRFP.ai’s native AI features remove many of the frustrations Loopio users report. Instead of manually feeding an ever-growing content library, AutoRFP.ai learns and updates your content in real time as you complete RFPs.
This updated information enables AutoRFP.ai to create better-quality responses - 63% of its AI-generated answers are submitted without any edits.
Key Features
After transitioning from Loopio to AutoRFP.ai, Workforce.com doubled their RFP volume and increased win rates by over 20%. These wins are accredited to AutoRFP.ai’s robust features, a few important ones discussed below.
AI Response Engine
AutoRFP.ai pulls information from a company’s content library and past RFP responses to quickly generate an accurate first draft.
Its AI Response Engine applies a trust-based scoring system to assess how well each piece of content meets the requirements included in the RFP.
AI Import
Importing an RFP (and similar documents) is rather straightforward in AutoRFP.ai. Excel-based RFPs are automatically detected (even across multiple tabs) and PDF and Word RFPs are instantly filled out in customer formats.
It also offers a browser extension, so you can complete RFPs across any platform or format.
AI Translation
No matter where your RFP comes from, AutoRFP.ai auto-translates your response in 30+ languages. It even auto-localizes in US and UK English, so every bid feels professional and tailored - helping teams increase RFP response success rates.
Pricing
Plan Name | Plan Cost |
Scale | $899/month |
Accelerate | $1,299/month |
Enterprise | Contact sales |
Side note: AutoRFP.ai provides a 30 day money-back guarantee, so you can try out the platform risk-free.
Where AutoRFP.ai Shines
Consistent, high-quality RFP responses: With generative AI at its core, AutoRFP.ai delivers accurate responses that also incorporate win themes. Every answer is accompanied with its source, giving you confidence that there are no hallucinations.
Secure platform: AutoRFP.ai is ISO27001 and SOC 2 certified. No customer data is used to train LLMs - unlike some of its competitors, including Loopio.
Easy and quick set up: Users report quick time to value as it is straightforward to set up, helping them initiate their first project in no time.
What AutoRFP.ai May Lack
Simpler reporting: While AutoRFP.ai gives real-time insights into response quality, win rates, and trends, some of its customers have requested more advanced reporting which the AutoRFP.ai team is currently looking to implement.
Customer Reviews
AutoRFP.ai’s customers have the following to say about their experience:
“The use of AI to parse through the zillion questions in our database and find the closest match saves so much time,” says Pete W.
“The setup and integration process requires significantly less effort compared to competitors, and once it's configured with past RFPs and the right company and product content, it streamlines the response workflow significantly,” shares Elia W.
Who AutoRFP.ai Is Best For
B2B SaaS companies that serve enterprise customers and operate at a mid-to-large scale. These companies typically have dedicated roles such as RFP managers, bid writers, and account executives.
Financial services organizations, particularly managed investment funds, that employ large teams and handle a high volume of due diligence questionnaires each year.
Responsive
Responsive is another legacy RFP software that is popular among established companies. It offers a vast product portfolio, helping its customers speed up the RFP response process.
Key Features
Content library: Responsive's strongest feature is its unlimited content storage that enables teams to streamline and automate RFP responses.
Integrations: With 20+ native integrations and 75+ APIs to productivity tools, CRM systems and more, Responsive connects seamlessly with your existing tech stack.
Profile center: Companies can safely share security and compliance information, like credentials and data sheets, through private profiles or public trust centers.
Pricing
Plan Name | Plan Cost |
Lite Edition | Contact sales |
Emerging Edition | Contact sales |
Growth Edition | Contact sales |
Enterprise Edition | Contact sales |
Side note: Responsive doesn’t provide a free trial per se but does provide a proof of concept for prospects to evaluate.
Where Responsive Shines
Robust collaboration features: With Responsive, customers can assign tasks, track progress, and streamline communication to reduce back-and-forth among team members.
Advanced analytics: Responsive provides 10 ready-to-use reports and calculates key metrics to analyze the RFP response process.
Where Responsive Falls Short
Unintuitive content search: Finding information in Q&A banks is difficult, as it depends on basic keyword search instead of advanced AI-powered semantic search.
Hidden pricing: All of Responsive’s price plans are not publicly available. On top of that, a lot of its useful features, like SSO, are locked behind paid add-ons.
Side note: AutoRFP.ai is the only tool in our list of Loopio alternatives that has transparent pricing. It also doesn’t include any paid add-ons, unlike Responsive. Learn more about AutoRFP.ai’s pricing here.
Customer Reviews
Responsive’s customers have the following to say about the platform:
“The ability to import RFPs directly from Excel sheets is a game-changer—it saves me a ton of time by allowing quick uploads and immediate action on large datasets,” shares Gabriel L.
“The text editing console is super basic, making content formatting tedious. Tables are flat out impossible - no formatting functionality at all,” says Cristine C.
Who Responsive Is Best For
Responsive is best for mid to large companies with a global customer base. These companies have an extensive tech stack and are looking for a secure tool that will fit right in.
Qvidian
Qvidian, part of the Upland Software family, is a proposal automation platform that combines content management and collaboration tools to streamline the RFP process.
Key Features
Central content management system: Qvidian centralizes all proposal content, making it easy for teams to quickly search for relevant responses.
AutoFill feature: Responses are automatically populated to save time when drafting a response. These responses originate from the content library that needs to be constantly updated.
Review workflows: Qvidian allows teams to set up a workflow where RFP responses are routed for review from one person to the next automatically.
Pricing
Qvidian’s pricing can't be accessed publicly. To get a quote, you need to contact their sales team.
Where Qvidian Shines
Affordable pricing: Even though Qvidian’s pricing isn’t available openly, its customers have reported it to be affordable than other tools in this list of Loopio competitors.
Powerful analytics: To optimize the proposal management process, Qvidian provides more than 70 reports and features a drag and drop builder for creating custom reports.
Where Qvidian Falls Short
Limited AI features: Qvidian is another legacy software - meaning it was developed at a time where AI usage wasn’t widespread. Even with AI features now added, it is not as competitive as some of the modern AI RFP management software, like AutoRFP.ai that was built with AI at its core. Hence, its AI features are more intuitive than Qvidian’s.
Complex UI/UX: Users face a steep learning curve and the unintuitive interface doesn’t make this adoption any easier.
Customer Reviews
Below are quotes from Qvidian customers about their product experience:
“It helps me save time by auto filling in response content within a matter of minutes rather than spending hours chasing people for responses located in various time zones,” shares Nicole C.
“Hoping for the AI to be useful in a way that makes sense for our organization in the future,” says Sierra.
Who Qvidian Is Best For
Qvidian is best for financial services customers that have enough bandwidth to train their employees with the ins and outs of the platform.
AutogenAI
AutogenAI is a native AI proposal writing platform, specifically designed for teams responding to long-form proposals instead of questionnaire-focused ones.
Key Features
AI-powered extract tool: Teams can determine whether an RFP is right for their company by using AI to analyze opportunity requirements and qualification criteria, saving time in the bid/no-bid decision process and improving the overall bid management process.
Research assistant: This feature gathers relevant information from both the knowledge library and the internet, reducing dependence on internal subject matter experts.
Gamma review™: AutogenAI brings all reviewers into a single workflow for a technical and security review, so no feedback is missed and proposals can be submitted earlier.
Pricing
The price plans for AutogenAI are not publicly available. You need to contact sales to get a quote.
Where AutogenAI Shines
Purpose-built for long-form proposals: Unlike RPF tools focused on questionnaires, AutogenAI excels at long-form proposal writing.
Robust security: Backed by multiple security certifications, AutogenAI is trusted by Fortune 500 companies and government agencies.
Where AutogenAI Falls Short
Import issues: Some users have reported difficulty in importing RPFs from Excel, Word, and PDF formats. This delays the submission time as a lot of manual copy pasting is involved.
Hallucinations: Compared to AutogenAI’s competitors, its AI features aren't as robust - resulting in hallucinations in generated content. In contrast, AutoRFP.ai cites the exact source of every response, eliminating any hallucinations that may occur.
Customer Reviews
AutogenAI customers have the following to say about their experience:
“Being able to scan previous submission content makes it super easy to extract relevant stats or processes, which speeds up writing tenders significantly,” shares Niamh C.
“I find the lack of integration with Word and PDF formats an inconvenience. Transferring proposals often requires cutting and pasting, which is time-consuming,” shares Dave E.
Pro Tip: Compared to AutogenAI, AutoRFP.ai fills out Word and PDF RFPs instantly in the customer’s format. It also supports easy exports, so PDF responses can be converted into your branded bid format.
Who AutogenAI Is Best For
AutogenAI is ideal for construction and non-profit companies that have to respond to long-form proposals and tenders.
Ombud
Last on our list is Ombud which uses generative AI and machine learning to generate high-quality responses to RFPs, security questionnaires, and proposals.
Key Features
Curate knowledge: Ombud centralizes all important knowledge in one place, where it automatically organizes and continuously updates it for you.
OmMatch: Instead of manually searching and copy pasting answers, this feature recommends accurate suggestions to autocomplete RFPs.
Collaborative workplace: Teams can manage all RFPs in one shared workspace, with automated tracking that replaces back-and-forth email communication.
Pricing
Ombud’s pricing is not openly available. You need to speak with their sales team to get a quote.
Where Ombud Shines
Continuous learning: Machine learning improves content recommendations over time as more RFPs are submitted.
Strong import and export features: It is straightforward to import RFPs from multiple formats into a workable template and then later export them in your prospect’s preferred format.
Where Ombud Falls Short
Unintuitive UX: Some users note that features like filter mode and collaboration tools could be made more effective for a smoother experience.
Limited feature set: While Ombud may get the job done, it lacks advanced features that its competitors like AutoRFP.ai and Responsive offer.
Customer Reviews
Ombud’s customers share their experiences below:
“Using the response library allows me to quickly search previous responses that may align to the current question, and, if necessary, quickly adjust the response to fit the current request,” says Jeremy M.
“UX is not the best. Sometimes I find it hard to assign questions to others, and find out what are my assignments,” shares Roy A.
Who Ombud Is Best For
Ombud is best for enterprise-level RevOps teams looking to automate the RFP response process.
Reasons to Consider an Alternative to Loopio Software
While Loopio has established itself as a recognizable name in proposal software, our analysis of 610+ user reviews reveals consistent pain points that impact productivity and performance.
Overpromised “Magic” Feature
Loopio's AI "Magic" feature promises to automatically suggest relevant content, but users consistently report it falls short. Reviews reveal Magic works only for basic, repetitive questions while struggling with nuanced requirements.
In comparison, AutoRFP.ai’s Response Engine provides 63% of answers that require no edits, powered by its trust-based scoring and AI capabilities.
High-Maintenance Content Library
Loopio requires constant manual library maintenance, which creates additional work instead of reducing it. Its users report that after 6-12 months, reviewing an ever-growing library becomes overwhelming.
AutoRFP.ai solves this through its "AI Flywheel," which automatically incorporates content changes as you complete RFPs, keeping content updated without the extra manual work.
Content Import Issues
Loopio users struggle with importing complex RFP formats. To top this, many users report being unable to export in the original document format. Again, creating more work because of manual formatting.
AutoRFP.ai streamlines this with intelligent import that automatically detects Excel-based RFPs. It also instantly fills out PDFs and Word documents in customer formats.
Automate Your RFP Response Workflow with AutoRFP.AI
Each of the Loopio alternatives above comes with strengths and trade-offs. The only way to know which RFP software fits your workflow is to test it yourself.
With AutoRFP.ai, you can do so risk-free. It comes with a 30-day money-back guarantee. Though, you probably won’t need it, given that over 50 users have rated it 5 stars on G2.
Ready to win more bids? Book a demo with AutoRFP.ai today.
Read more from our blog
Product Demo
See it in Action
Find 30 minutes to learn more about AutoRFP.ai and what the ROI might be for you.