Do you support single sign-on?
Yes. SSO through Okta and Microsoft Entra1, with SCIM provisioning.
1
Identity GuideTrust Score94.
Alternatives
The best Loopio alternative
- Your email
- Your info
- Let's talk
AutoRFP.ai is the accuracy-first AI platform for RFPs, security questionnaires, and DDQs: every answer source-grounded and citable, with zero library maintenance. See how it compares with Loopio, and why teams switch.
AutoRFP.ai
AI-native
- Starting price
- $899/month
- Standout
- Accuracy-first AI response engine
Loopio
Response management
- Starting price
- Not Public
- Standout
- Central response library
- Leader on G2
- “AutoRFP.ai is saving more than 60% of the time allocated before using the tool. The stakeholders involved can allocate this time to more strategic tasks.”Mihai PopaBid Manager · FintechOSRead the story
- “We've used AutoRFP.ai to win 50+ successful bids and plan to continue using it into the future for all bids that come through.”Jake PhillpotCEO · Workforce.comRead the story
- “AutoRFP.ai has genuinely been a game changer for our team across APAC. It has significantly reduced the time required to respond to RFPs while still maintaining a high standard of quality and accuracy.”Trevor CarlssonDirector, Solution Consulting · SugarAIRead the story
- “We've responded to more than double the number of RFPs after implementing AutoRFP.ai than we did the year before.”Rachel MillwardHead of Bid Management, Europe · PerkRead the story
- “It is saving a ton of time and it's allowing us to respond to more RFPs that we historically wouldn't have.”Rob TibbsMarket Principal & Account Executive · Red RoverRead the story
- “Part of me doesn't want to recommend it as I want to keep it for myself, but the product is just too good not to share!”Aref AbediCo-Founder & CEO · JobylonRead the story
- “Reaching the RFP stage with clients is now a smooth process. With a 90% automation rate, we can quickly produce a first draft based upon previous responses, making the RFP process efficient and stress-free.”Raphael SchmidegChief Operating Officer · IMTCRead the story
- “It's faster, it's more engaging and it's more accurate than our previous legacy RFP Software.”Jason McGeorgeSolutions Architect · ecoPortalRead the story
Why teams switch to AutoRFP.ai
Native Loopio library migration
AutoRFP.ai ships a native Loopio migration tool. Point it at a library export and it brings answers plus metadata such as tags into AutoRFP.ai, replicating thousands of content items in a few minutes.
Smarter, Practical AI
Save 70%+ of your time with AutoRFP.ai's leading AI Response Engine, AI Reviewer and more.
Easier to Use
Fewer clicks and a more intuitive design, so your team spends its time on the answers rather than on the tool.
Unlimited Users
With unlimited users and based on the number of Projects Per Year, we scale as you scale.
Comparison
Key differences
A side-by-side look at the capabilities that decide RFP, DDQ, and security-questionnaire outcomes.
Who each is for
- Loopio is best for
Proposal and security teams with large, well-governed answer libraries that run high volumes of repeat questionnaires.
Where Loopio shines
- Excellent knowledge managementLoopio is especially strong for approved-answer reuse and library health, with "Close the Loop" workflows that make it easy to keep content current.
- Polished, easy-to-adopt UXReviews consistently praise the clean interface, implementation experience, and day-to-day usability, which helps teams roll it out quickly.
- Structured collaborationAssigning questions to SMEs, tracking progress, and managing reviews in one workspace keeps high-volume questionnaire work moving across deadlines.
- AutoRFP.ai is best for
Mid-to-large B2B SaaS, financial services, and regulated teams responding to high volumes of RFPs, DDQs, and security questionnaires.
Public pricing from $899/month, unlimited users, and a 30-day money-back guarantee on every plan.
Book a demo
Read the full comparison
Loopio is one of the most recognizable names in response management, and for teams with a well-curated library it does that job well. The friction shows up over time: the content library needs constant manual upkeep, the bolted-on “Magic” AI struggles with anything non-standard, and exports often need cleanup before they’re submission-ready.
AutoRFP.ai takes the opposite approach. It is AI-native, it builds on the library the team already trusts, drafts cited answers from that approved content, and exports back in the customer’s original format. That’s why teams like Workforce.com doubled their RFP volume and lifted win rates by more than 20% after moving off Loopio.
Switching does not mean rebuilding the library. The native Loopio migration tool carries answers and metadata (including tags) into AutoRFP.ai and can replicate thousands of content items in a few minutes.
Loopio is a well-run content library; AutoRFP.ai builds on that library with automatic growth and upkeep, keeping the team in control. If you came here comparing Loopio pricing after a renewal quote, start with that difference: AutoRFP.ai writes only from content the team has approved, routes anything it cannot support to a person, and ties every draft to a Trust Score and its exact sources. We’d rather show you than tell you: prove it on your own RFPs in a two-week proof of concept, then check the pricing (from $899/month, unlimited users, owners still directing review).
AutoRFP.ai
Yes on 9 of 9
Loopio
Yes on 1 · Partial on 3 · No on 5
| Capability | AutoRFP.ai | Loopio |
|---|---|---|
| AI-native platform (built on generative AI, not added later) | Yes | PartialAI added to a legacy suite |
| Zero hallucination by design (100% source-grounded answers) | Yes | No |
| A library that maintains and improves itself | Yes | NoManual library upkeep |
| Import RFPs from tens of formats | Yes5,000+ requirements; 500+ page Word files | Partial |
| Public, transparent pricing | Yes | No |
| Unlimited collaborator users (no per-seat fees) | YesLive co-editing, comments, and assignments | NoPer-seat licensing |
| Built-in translation and localization (44+) | Yes | Partial |
| SOC 2 Type II certified | Yes | Yes |
| ISO 27001 certified | Yes | NoSays 'based on' ISO 27001 - not certified |
Comparison based on public product information and verified user reviews as of November 2026. A dash (–) indicates the capability isn't clearly documented, or that the row does not apply. Zero hallucination by design means AutoRFP.ai drafts only from content your team has approved, cites the source of every answer, and routes anything it cannot support to a person for review.
Pricing
Transparent pricing, right here
Scale
$899/mo
paid yearly
- 24 Projects per Year
- Online Training
Accelerate
$1,299/mo
paid yearly
- 50 Projects per Year
- Online Training
Enterprise
Flexible pricing that scales with your business
- Scalable Projects per Year
- Bespoke Implementation
- Bespoke Terms
Every plan includes
- Unlimited AI
- Unlimited Content
- Unlimited Users
- All Features
- SSO (Google & Microsoft)
- 18+ Integrations
- ISO 27001:2022 & SOC 2
- Unlimited Support
Customer story
Before and after AutoRFP.ai
How FintechOS moved from manual library matching to GenAI-powered response automation.
Before AutoRFP.ai
Before using AutoRFP.ai, our main challenge was the lack of AI capabilities in our previous RFP software.
… each question had to be manually reviewed and responded to, even though we had an answer library to use. While the software could suggest potential matches from past responses, the process was still time-consuming and labor-intensive.
After AutoRFP.ai
With AutoRFP.ai's GenAI capabilities, we now auto-generate responses almost instantly.
The quality of the responses has been high, enabling our team to focus on fine-tuning rather than starting from scratch.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Something else on your list? Bring it to a demo and we will answer it on one of your own questionnaires.
What is the best Loopio alternative?
For teams that want AI-native automation that builds on the library they already trust, AutoRFP.ai is the leading Loopio alternative.
It captures approved responses, drafts cited first drafts, and publishes transparent flat pricing with unlimited users.
How much does Loopio cost?
Loopio's entry "Foundations" tier is widely reported to start around $20,000/year, with higher tiers quote-only.
Pricing isn't published publicly, so you'll need a sales call.
AutoRFP.ai, by contrast, lists flat pricing from $899/month.
Is AutoRFP.ai better than Loopio for security questionnaires?
AutoRFP.ai is built for RFPs, DDQs, and security questionnaires alike, with portal scraping (Ariba, UpGuard, Jaggaer), source-cited answers, and a go/no-go risk scan.
Teams switching from Loopio keep their library and owners, then let capture and connected-source updates handle routine freshness work.
What is Loopio?
Loopio is an RFP response platform built around a curated answer library that your team maintains and reuses.
It is established and capable, but it predates generative AI, reviewers most often cite manual library upkeep and enterprise pricing that starts around $20,000/year.
Does Loopio offer a free trial or demo?
Loopio demos go through its sales team; there is no self-serve free trial.
AutoRFP.ai runs a free two-week proof of concept on your actual RFPs, book a 30-minute demo and see cited first drafts, with 80-90% typically usable as-is, before you commit to anything.
Can I migrate my Loopio content library into AutoRFP.ai?
Yes.
AutoRFP.ai includes a native Loopio migration tool.
Upload a library export and the structured import keeps answers, categories, and metadata such as tags.
Thousands of content items can be replicated in a few minutes, so the team starts from a complete library.
How does Loopio compare with Responsive (RFPIO)?
Loopio and Responsive are the two biggest legacy response-management suites; the comparison usually comes down to Loopio's library workflow versus Responsive's process depth.
Teams weighing Loopio vs Responsive increasingly shortlist an AI-native option too.
AutoRFP.ai drafts source-grounded answers from that same trusted library, with owners still directing review.
What do Loopio reviews say?
Loopio reviews are broadly positive on collaboration and answer-library organization, while recurring criticisms include manual content maintenance, clunky Excel handling, and cost at scale.
AutoRFP.ai holds a 4.9 G2 rating and a library that grows from approved work, so routine filing is not a separate job.
Book a demo
See it on your own RFPs
We'd rather show you than tell you: prove it side by side with Loopio in a two-week proof of concept.