Do you support single sign-on?
Yes. SSO through Okta and Microsoft Entra1, with SCIM provisioning.
1Identity GuideTrust Score94.
Alternatives
AutoRFP.ai is the accuracy-first AI platform for RFPs, security questionnaires, and DDQs: every answer source-grounded and citable, with zero library maintenance. See how it compares with Iris (Hey Iris), and why teams switch.
AutoRFP.ai
AI-native
Iris
AI-native RFP automation

AutoRFP.ai adds go/no-go analysis, an AI Q&A bot, portal questionnaire answering, review workflows, and reporting on top of AI drafting.
AutoRFP.ai retrieves by meaning, not keywords: 80-90% of first-draft answers are usable as-is, grounded in your approved content.
Approved answers are captured as the team works, and connected sources stay current. Owners keep tagging, curation, and approval instead of pruning the library by hand.
Comparison
A side-by-side look at the capabilities that decide RFP, DDQ, and security-questionnaire outcomes.
Iris is best for
Small teams that want simple, low-friction AI answer generation for occasional RFPs and questionnaires without a heavy implementation project.
Where Iris shines
AutoRFP.ai is best for
Mid-to-large B2B SaaS, financial services, and regulated teams responding to high volumes of RFPs, DDQs, and security questionnaires.
Public pricing from $899/month, unlimited users, and a 30-day money-back guarantee on every plan.
Book a demoIris is a lightweight way to start with AI-assisted RFP responses, and for small teams with occasional questionnaires its simplicity is the appeal. The friction shows up with volume: users describe a feature set that stays close to basic drafting, accuracy that leans on keyword matching, manual library upkeep, and integrations that miss key systems.
AutoRFP.ai is the step up: semantic retrieval that keeps 80-90% of first drafts usable as-is, a library the team brings and builds on, portal automation, go/no-go analysis, and the reporting to run response work as an operation, on transparent flat pricing.
Iris generates drafts fast; the question is what happens when you need more than a draft. AutoRFP.ai answers by meaning rather than keywords, writes only from approved content (routing anything it cannot support to a person), and covers the whole operation: portals, go/no-go analysis, reviews, and reporting. See it on your own questionnaires in a two-week proof of concept; pricing is public, from $899/month.
AutoRFP.ai
Yes on 9 of 9
Iris
Yes on 2 · No on 3 · Not documented on 4
| Capability | AutoRFP.ai | Iris |
|---|---|---|
| AI-native platform (built on generative AI, not added later) | Yes | Yes |
| Zero hallucination by design (100% source-grounded answers) | Yes | No |
| A library that maintains and improves itself | Yes | NoManual library upkeep reported |
| Import RFPs from tens of formats | Yes5,000+ requirements; 500+ page Word files | – |
| Public, transparent pricing | Yes | No |
| Unlimited collaborator users (no per-seat fees) | YesLive co-editing, comments, and assignments | – |
| Built-in translation and localization (44+) | Yes | – |
| SOC 2 Type II certified | Yes | Yes |
| ISO 27001 certified | Yes | – |
Comparison based on public product information and verified user reviews as of November 2026. A dash (–) indicates the capability isn't clearly documented, or that the row does not apply. Zero hallucination by design means AutoRFP.ai drafts only from content your team has approved, cites the source of every answer, and routes anything it cannot support to a person for review.
Pricing
$899/mo
paid yearly
$1,299/mo
paid yearly
Flexible pricing that scales with your business
Every plan includes
FAQ
Something else on your list? Bring it to a demo and we will answer it on one of your own questionnaires.
AutoRFP.ai is the leading Iris alternative for teams that have outgrown basic AI answer generation.
It adds semantic retrieval, a library that grows from approved work, portal automation, go/no-go analysis, and reporting, on transparent flat pricing from $899/month with unlimited users.
Iris doesn't publish pricing publicly. AutoRFP.ai lists transparent flat pricing from $899/month with unlimited users, so you can evaluate cost before ever talking to sales.
The most common reasons are accuracy (semantic retrieval instead of keyword matching), a library that stays current without turning upkeep into a separate job, broader integrations, and a complete workflow, portals, reviews, go/no-go, and reporting, rather than drafting alone.
Iris, often searched as Hey Iris or heyiris.ai, is a lightweight AI tool for drafting responses to RFPs and questionnaires.
It is a low-friction way for small teams to start with AI-assisted response work, with a feature set that stays close to core answer generation.
Users credit Iris for simplicity, while the recurring concerns are a limited feature set beyond drafting, accuracy that leans on keyword matching rather than semantic understanding, manual library upkeep, and integration gaps.
Those four are precisely where AutoRFP.ai differs.
Iris is accessed through its own sign-up flow. AutoRFP.ai runs a free two-week proof of concept on your actual RFPs: book a 30-minute demo, connect your content, and see source-grounded drafts with 80-90% usable as-is.
Book a demo
We'd rather show you than tell you: prove it side by side with Iris in a two-week proof of concept.