The best Iris alternative

AutoRFP.ai is the accuracy-first AI platform for RFPs, security questionnaires, and DDQs: every answer source-grounded and citable, with zero library maintenance. See how it compares with Iris (Hey Iris), and why teams switch.

G2 Top 100 Fastest Growing Products 2026
4.9 (60)

Ranked #44 of 151,264 fastest-growing software products on G2

AutoRFP.aiAutoRFP.ai

AI-native

Starting price
$899/month
Standout
Accuracy-first AI response engine
Iris logo

Iris

AI-native RFP automation

Starting price
Not Public
Standout
Simple AI answer generation
  1. Your email
  2. Your info
  3. Let's talk

Request a demo

We just need a few quick details.

Trusted by teams at

JobylonSugarCRMRed RoverfintechOSCubikoHEPTAGON CapitalWorkforce.comIMTCecoPortalFiddler AIBDS SolutionsMedeAnalyticsPerk

Challenges

Struggling with Iris (Hey Iris)

Drafting is where it ends

Iris covers answer generation, but go/no-go analysis, portal answering, review workflow, and reporting all live somewhere else, usually in spreadsheets.

Keyword matches, not meaning

When retrieval leans on exact keywords, differently-worded questions surface the wrong content, and every draft needs a heavier edit than it should.

A library you maintain by hand

Iris teams describe manually organizing and pruning content libraries, the exact upkeep AI response software was supposed to remove.

So, if you're reviewing your options and looking for an alternative to Iris (Hey Iris), keep reading…

Comparison

Why winners switch to AutoRFP.ai

A complete response workflow, not just drafts

AutoRFP.ai adds go/no-go analysis, an AI Q&A bot, portal questionnaire answering, review workflows, and reporting on top of AI drafting.

Semantic accuracy instead of keyword matching

AutoRFP.ai retrieves by meaning, not keywords: 80-90% of first-draft answers are usable as-is, grounded in your approved content.

Zero library maintenance

The library updates itself from approved answers over time, so teams skip the manual curation work Iris users describe.

A platform that delivers proven results

10%

Higher win rate on submitted RFPs

Workforce.com

90%

Automation rate across questionnaire responses

Red Rover

32 → 2

Hours per RFP response

IMTC

Comparison

Key differences

A side-by-side look at the capabilities that decide RFP, DDQ, and security-questionnaire outcomes.

AutoRFP.ai compared with Iris
CapabilityAutoRFP.aiAutoRFP.aiIris
AI-native platform (built on generative AI, not added later)
Yes
Yes
Zero hallucination by design (100% source-grounded answers)
Yes
No
Self-cleansing library that learns from approved answers
Yes
No
Manual library upkeep reported
Imports Word, Excel, PDF & portal questionnaires
Yes
Not disclosed
Public, transparent pricing
Yes
No
Unlimited users — no per-seat fees
Yes
Not disclosed
Built-in translation & localization
Yes
Not disclosed
Regional data hosting options (US, EU & Australia)
Yes
Not disclosed
SOC 2 Type II certified
Yes
Yes
ISO 27001 certified
Yes
Not disclosed

Comparison based on public product information and verified user reviews as of July 2026. indicates the capability isn't clearly documented.

Pricing

Transparent pricing, right here

Scale

$899/mo

paid yearly

  • 24 Projects per Year
  • Unlimited AI
  • Unlimited Content
  • Unlimited Users
  • All Features
  • SSO (Google & Microsoft)
  • 18+ Integrations
  • ISO 27001:2022 & SOC 2
  • Unlimited Support
  • Online Training

Accelerate

$1,299/mo

paid yearly

  • 50 Projects per Year
  • Unlimited AI
  • Unlimited Content
  • Unlimited Users
  • All Features
  • SSO (Google & Microsoft)
  • 18+ Integrations
  • ISO 27001:2022 & SOC 2
  • Unlimited Support
  • Online Training

Enterprise

Flexible pricing that scales with your business

  • Scalable Projects per Year
  • Unlimited AI
  • Unlimited Content
  • Unlimited Users
  • All Features
  • SSO (Google & Microsoft)
  • 18+ Integrations
  • ISO 27001:2022 & SOC 2
  • Unlimited Support
  • Bespoke Implementation
  • Bespoke Terms

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the best Iris AI alternative?

AutoRFP.ai is the leading Iris alternative for teams that have outgrown basic AI answer generation. It adds semantic retrieval, a self-maintaining library, portal automation, go/no-go analysis, and reporting, on transparent flat pricing from $899/month with unlimited users.

How much does Iris cost?

Iris doesn't publish pricing publicly. AutoRFP.ai lists transparent flat pricing from $899/month with unlimited users, so you can evaluate cost before ever talking to sales.

Why do teams switch from Iris to AutoRFP.ai?

The most common reasons are accuracy (semantic retrieval instead of keyword matching), the end of manual library upkeep, broader integrations, and a complete workflow, portals, reviews, go/no-go, and reporting, rather than drafting alone.

What is Iris (Hey Iris)?

Iris, often searched as Hey Iris or heyiris.ai, is a lightweight AI tool for drafting responses to RFPs and questionnaires. It is a low-friction way for small teams to start with AI-assisted response work, with a feature set that stays close to core answer generation.

What do Iris reviews say?

Users credit Iris for simplicity, while the recurring concerns are a limited feature set beyond drafting, accuracy that leans on keyword matching rather than semantic understanding, manual library upkeep, and integration gaps. Those four are precisely where AutoRFP.ai differs.

Does Iris offer a free trial or demo?

Iris is accessed through its own sign-up flow. AutoRFP.ai runs a free two-week proof of concept on your actual RFPs: book a 30-minute demo, connect your content, and see source-grounded drafts with 80-90% usable as-is.

The bottom line

Iris is a lightweight way to start with AI-assisted RFP responses, and for small teams with occasional questionnaires its simplicity is the appeal. The friction shows up with volume: users describe a feature set that stays close to basic drafting, accuracy that leans on keyword matching, manual library upkeep, and integrations that miss key systems.

AutoRFP.ai is the step up, semantic retrieval that keeps 80-90% of first drafts usable as-is, a library that maintains itself from approved answers, portal automation, go/no-go analysis, and the reporting to run response work as an operation, on transparent flat pricing.

Iris generates drafts fast; the question is what happens when you need more than a draft. AutoRFP.ai answers by meaning rather than keywords, writes only from approved content (leaving a blank rather than guessing), and covers the whole operation: portals, go/no-go analysis, reviews, and reporting. See it on your own questionnaires in a two-week proof of concept; pricing is public, from $899/month.

See it on your own RFPs

We'd rather show you than tell you: prove it side by side with Iris in a two-week proof of concept.