Back to blog
Guide

How to Respond to an RFP with Claude: Go/No-Go to First Draft

Learn how to respond to an RFP with Claude, step by step: project setup, go/no-go, a compliance matrix, win themes, and a first draft that flags gaps.

Rob Dickson

Rob Dickson

Ops Lead, AutoRFP.ai··7 min read

Most teams open the RFP and start writing. That puts the blank document before the decisions that should shape it.

This walkthrough takes one mock opportunity through a focused RFP response process in Claude. It is a single respond path, from project setup and qualification to a first draft. If you want the broader proposal craft and a catalogue of reusable Claude skills, use the companion guide on how to write a bid proposal.

How to Respond to an RFP with Claude: Go/No-Go to First Draft
Video transcript

Your RFP has just landed. Now you're wanting to use Claude to respond to that RFP in an effective and efficient manner. I'm gonna show you the crucial five steps you need to take in Claude for responding to your RFP. We're gonna go into setting up your own project with all your company context so that Claude has the right information on how to respond to your RFP. We're then going to go into AI go, no-go, so you can decide even before you start whether you want to bid on that RFP. We're gonna go through looking at the compliance matrix and do you even have a shot against the evaluator's criteria before going in. And then we're gonna go into generating win themes with AI and finally responding to the RFP. This is all so important, and you can actually use Claude skills along every step of the RFP to really nail your output.

And of course, as always, keep the human in the loop and ensure that your answers are accurate, and not only are you going to respond, but help you actually win. My name's Rob Dickson, I'm from AutoRFP.ai, and let's jump into it all. So how to respond to an RFP with Claude. So looking at qualifying, mapping, drafting, and finally getting that information out to your subject matter experts to help you win. Before we go into it, what is a go, no go? Effectively, it's looking into should we bid on this RFP or not. We ran a survey across over 100 winning bid teams with Stargazy, a bid manager community, and what we found is that 71% of teams that win more than fifty percent of their RFPs run a dedicated go, no go step. This is so important, and AI is really great for this. So let's jump into how Claude can help you with this.

But first, I have set up a fake company with a fake RFP for today's video. We have a Claude project. You can see here in setup in Claude or cowork with all the relevant documentation of that company. It has memory, and it has instructions. These instructions you can actually download in the description below and you wanna of course, make them relevant to your company, how you write and everything else. Other documents and context I'd put here is like technical information past RFP responses. If you have a library of historical context, that could be your security documents and policies, it could be your websites, it could be a bunch of like markdown files that are relevant to your company. I would really ensure you have examples of great responses. AI works really well when not only it doesn't have context about your company, but it also has examples of how you would actually respond.

Best way to do that is past RFPs or tenders you have responded to, and make sure that they're labeled correctly, and in your project instructions, point out to those different contexts and when to refer to it. What I'd recommend is almost having a context file called project context map.md and ask Claude to write and list all of the context that you have in the project file. And this can be something that Claude, in its instructions, is pointed to and uses consistently to find the most relevant context. Kinda like a knowledge graph or map for it. Once you've got your project set up, let's get into actually responding to an RFP. So I have my RFP. I go into Claude. I'm gonna use my go, no-go skill. So what your skills are, and every single skill I'm gonna cover off today, you can download in the description below off AutoRFP.ai's website. We have a skill library that is incredibly useful to use across all different kinds of parts of the RFP process, and you can download them all for free

on our website at AutoRFP.ai/skills or in the description below. So what is a skill? Effectively, a skill is just a predetermined instructions for your AI, in this case, Claude, on what it needs to do and steps it needs to take. This includes an overview, includes content. So here's the instructions of the skill, and this one also uses a go, no-go decision framework. So it's a built-in framework and even a spreadsheet file that it can use to then ensure that effectively it's generating consistency, consistent output. Again, you wanna make sure you customize these skills to your organization, and then you can share them across your entire Claude tenant, so everyone can use and share the same skill. So I've invoked this skill. You can generally invoke skills just with a backslash. For instance, AI Go/No-Go. And here I've used the skill, uploaded the RFP, and that's all I need to do. I don't need to worry about some complicated prompt.

Effectively, that skill is my complicated prompt that is saved in my organization, and it repeats and gives Claude a really repeatable way to get me a consistent output. So it's gone through, and it's scaled it as a conditional go at seventy-seven percent, so seventy-seven out of a hundred. The reason is because based off the scorecard of my Go/No-Go decision framework, it's looked at what we need to worry about. It looks at my past contacts or what we've promised to them in the lead-up to the RFP. It's looked at the references here. Are there any named references that are actually relevant to the prospect? So can we win this thing? Have we done this kind of work before? It looks at relevant pricing, and it looks at a whole bunch of other stuff as well, especially around contradicts contradictions and so on. And then it generated me my Go/No-Go analysis report, and then I could bring that to my team, and we can discuss that in detail about whether that is accurate and whether we actually want to proceed with this RFP or not. So that's the important first step.

I have not written a word. I've maybe read the RFP. But before I even go to start writing my, on my blank draft, I've done my Go/No-Go. Once you've done your Go/No-Go, really useful one is then Compliance Matrix Builder. This is, again, another skill that you can download in the description below. And what this does it pr- effectively goes through after the Go/No-Go and checks whether we are gonna meet the compliance. It's gonna give me a mock evaluation score based on that. So anything that I need to look at, it's gone through, given me my project submission instructions what needs attention, and effectively what I need to action. So going in here, I can then see my submission checklist to everything I actually need to do, so effectively my own RFP submission checklist, which is really helpful ensuring the bid gets in on time, works really well in delegating those tasks to different team members, and ensure that we're a clean and efficient team to ensure we get through that. My evaluation criteria, so it's effectively extracted that from

the RFP document and looked at where, what the scoring matrix is. Because effectively, when you write an RFP to win, you don't only need to be compliant, but you need to make sure you achieving maximum marks as possible against their evaluation criteria. And then it's made some observations about the RFP as well as the requirements matrix. So it's exported and shredded that RFP for me and got everything ready to ensure that we can start writing. So we've decided to bid. We know what we need to achieve and do in the RFP. Let's get to writing it, actually winning the thing. That's where our next skills works. So firstly, we wanted to generate win themes. The win theme is what is the unique competitive positioning and reasons behind what we understand about the prospect, so l- putting it in their own language and everything else to ensure about why we're competitive and why we will win this bid.

So for instance, my talent acquisition software, we can look about what they're waiting, so what's important to them. We should-- I also have a lot of information about this RFP 'cause we've done prior conversations with the prospect. Talking about why now, so why are they actually looking to b-build, why are they looking to acquire my solution? Mapping all the stakeholders, so important. What does each stakeholder actually care about? Also very important. It's gone into the competitive field effectively and then it's generated my win themes. Gone into my second theme, consolidate hiring as well, and then gone into my third theme, board-ready numbers and hiring retention. So reporting is important to them. Then what it does is each of those themes that it generates, it maps those themes to the different sections, also take into account the evaluation criteria and everything else. Once we have our themes, then it's actually time to respond to the RFP. You've noticed most teams may start with a blank RFP and straightaway start writing.

I've used AI to do a lot of heavy lifting before that step to ensure that when we actually go to start writing, A, we know we want to bid on it, B, we know we're competitive and have a chance to win, and C, we know why we can win this and what we need to weave into every single respond to win the RFP. That's where Claude is really useful across the entire RFP response process and responding to the RFP to actually get you to win the RFP. So then we go in and effectively it started responding to the RFP, and it's given me the, that output in the prospect's original documents. And then I can go in, I can have a look. And then it's effectively it's started responding to that RFP. I can go down here. It's given me gaps, so like certain things that it can't answer, it's highlighted that. It's gone in to write me an executive summary. It's started responding each of this information. Again, you can see what context it has a gap for.

It actually has a lot of gaps. That gives me an indication I need to strengthen my content library in my Claude project. 'Cause if the AI can't find the answer, we've made sure that this skill for responding to the RFP will actually mean that instead of trying to guess and make something up that could potentially be incorrect, it's instead made sure it's highlighted that it doesn't have the information, and that's for me to go in and respond to So then I've given all that information, it's responded to everything. I would upload this to Google Docs or SharePoint for Microsoft Word, then I would tag the relevant team members and get everyone involved, and we start to respond to this RFP. And then once I've completed, I ensure that I go back to Claude, upload my completed RFP, and make sure that is saved to my context, so the next time we get these questions, it can pull from my completed RFP to then use that information to respond to the RFP. So that's how you can use Claude. I still have a lot of work in front of me, but Claude and a really strong bid process

helped me streamline getting started, get- gotten my first AI draft, generated my win themes, and even before we did all that, it helped me decide whether we want to bid on this and then what we need to do to submit and meet the evaluator's criteria. So I'm Rob from AutoRFP.ai. You can visit our website. We're an AI RFP software. So generally, if you're doing more than, say, thirty bids a year, and winning is incredibly important to your organization, getting accurate and quality responses in to actually win the RFP, you definitely wanna check out AutoRFP.ai. You can visit our website. Our pricing is transparent, and you can book a demo. Where Claude can sometimes fall short, and this is where teams will pick up AutoRFP.ai, is when they have a lot of different team members responding to that RFP. You'll notice in Claude, collaboration is incredibly difficult.

Second, you have content that lives in a lot of different places, and you wanna make sure that can be centralized into your AI content library. Claude, although you can give it information, it's not the best at actually finding the most relevant information. You could see in my completed RFP that it had a lot of gaps, and I said maybe it doesn't have that information, or maybe it did and it just didn't try hard enough to find it. And you'll also find a lot of times when talking to Claude, you might have to ask, "Hey, where did you get that answer from?" Because you're not necessarily confident that it didn't just make it up. Even if you give all the great prompts and skills in place, you wanna make sure that you're still asking it to validate those answers, and occasionally you will get back, "Yeah, you're absolutely right. I made that up." That's where AutoRFP.ai is really strong in that we do AI citations, so every single sentence generated by AI, you can see exactly where it came from. You never have to ask where it came from, and the AI is validating that on every single output. And then secondly, you're not necessarily locked into Claude.

You-- We use all the best models from GPT-6 to Gemini 4 to Sonnet 4.5 and 5.5 And effectively, we use across every single model what they're best at in- across the entire RFP process to help you respond incredibly efficiently, as well as quality responses you can trust that actually will help you win the RFP. So I've been Rob from AutoRFP.ai. In the description below are all the different links for the skills and the proposal win rate report I mentioned at the start. And yeah, hope you have learnt something today about how you can use Claude to help you win RFPs efficiently. Thanks.

Claude is useful here because it can hold a long RFP, follow saved instructions, and produce structured working documents. Your team still owns the bid decision, strategy, commercial judgment, and final review.

AutoRFP.ai takes an accuracy-first approach to this work. It drafts from content your team has approved, shows the sources behind each answer, and routes unsupported questions to a person. That is the standard to keep in mind as you build a manual Claude workflow.

Set up a Claude project before you write

Start by creating one Claude project for the opportunity. In the video, I use a fake company and a fake RFP so the full workflow can be shown without exposing a live bid.

Add the context Claude will need:

  • Project instructions that define the job, the order of work, and the expected output.
  • Past RFP responses, labelled so Claude can tell which document and section it is using.
  • Security documents, policies, technical material, pricing guidance, and company information.
  • Examples of answers your team considers strong.
  • Notes from earlier conversations with the prospect, where they are approved for bid use.

The examples matter. Company facts tell Claude what is true. Past answers also show how your team explains those facts.

Next, ask Claude to create a file called project context map.md. Its job is to list the files in the project, what each contains, and when Claude should use it. Point the project instructions to that map. This gives Claude a repeatable route to the relevant context instead of leaving it to inspect every file from scratch each time.

The video uses Claude skills for the specialist jobs. A skill is a saved set of instructions, supporting files, and frameworks. For example, the AI Go/No-Go Agent Skill carries the qualification steps and scorecard so the team does not rebuild a complicated prompt for every opportunity. Customize any skill to your own criteria before sharing it across the team.

The Cowork project instructions used in the recording are available from the video description. Treat them as a starting point, then change the language, decision rules, and source hierarchy to match your company.

Run an AI go/no-go before a word of the draft

A go/no-go asks whether the opportunity deserves your team’s bid effort. It should happen before writers begin filling pages.

The wider Go/No-Go framework for RFPs covers strategic fit, delivery capability, buyer relationship, pricing, references, competitive position, and the resources needed to submit. Claude can collect evidence and apply the scorecard, but it cannot make the final business decision for you.

71%

of high-win teams have a Go/No-Go qualification step.

In the mock example, Claude returns a Conditional Go at 77 out of 100. It explains the result through the scorecard, including the relevance of named references, pricing information, prior commitments, and possible contradictions. That explanation is more useful than the score alone because it gives the bid team specific points to challenge.

Bring the output to the people who own the deal. Confirm the assumptions, supply any missing information, and decide whether to proceed. A well formatted AI report does not remove accountability from the team.

Build the compliance matrix and the submission checklist

Once the team decides to bid, extract the rules before drafting the response.

The Compliance Matrix Builder Agent Skill used in the video turns the RFP into four working views:

  1. A requirements matrix that preserves what the buyer asked.
  2. A submission checklist with actions and dates.
  3. The evaluation criteria and scoring structure.
  4. A mock evaluation showing where the current bid may need attention.

This is the practical purpose of an RFP compliance matrix. It connects each requirement to an owner and a place in the response, while keeping submission instructions visible.

Compliance and responsiveness are different jobs. The matrix helps you satisfy the instructions that keep the proposal eligible. The evaluation criteria tell you what the buyer is likely to reward. A response can tick every box and still score poorly if it does not address the buyer’s priorities, risks, and desired outcomes.

Use the checklist to assign attachments, approvals, and deadlines. Use the criteria to decide how much space and proof each section deserves. Only then should drafting begin.

Generate win themes, then map them to sections

A win theme gives the evaluator a clear, supportable reason to choose you. It connects something the buyer cares about with a strength you can prove.

Before generating themes, give Claude the context behind the opportunity:

  • Why the buyer is acting now.
  • Which stakeholders will evaluate or live with the solution.
  • What each stakeholder cares about.
  • Who else may be competing and where your evidence is genuinely different.
  • Which evaluation criteria carry the decision.

In the mock scenario, the prospect is a talent acquisition company with a team of two planning to hire 90 people. Claude identifies themes around creating capacity, consolidating hiring, and producing board-ready reporting. It then maps each theme to the response sections where it should appear.

The important step is the mapping. A list of slogans at the top of the project will not influence the evaluation. The themes need to shape the executive summary, solution sections, implementation approach, and proof. The full guide to win themes explains how to test each one against buyer priorities and available evidence.

Ask the deal team to challenge the themes before drafting. Remove any that a competitor could claim without changing a word. Strengthen any theme that lacks a case study, reference, method, or other approved proof.

Draft in the buyer’s file and flag the gaps

Now ask Claude to draft against the matrix, the agreed themes, and the company context. Keep the output in the buyer’s structure. If the RFP arrived in a Word or spreadsheet format, preserve its order and response fields so the first draft remains easy to review and return.

The recording shows Claude producing an internal draft, including an RFP executive summary, then marking areas where it cannot find enough context. Those gaps are useful. They tell the proposal manager what needs a subject matter expert, a commercial owner, or more approved evidence.

Use a clear instruction such as:

Write only from the project files. If the sources do not support an answer, mark the requirement as a gap, explain what is missing, and assign the question for human review. Do not invent a customer fact, metric, reference, price, or product capability.

Reviewers should be able to see the difference between sourced draft text and an unresolved requirement. Do not let polished prose hide uncertainty.

Move the working draft into Google Docs or SharePoint when the wider team needs to contribute. Assign each gap to the right person. After the response is approved and submitted, save the completed document back into the project as last year’s answers. Label it clearly so Claude can use the approved result on the next relevant bid.

This creates a useful loop: every finished response improves the examples and facts available to the next project. Someone still needs to own freshness, remove superseded information, and make sure Claude is drawing from the right version.

Where a shared team outgrows the Claude project

Claude is a strong workspace for learning this method and proving the sequence on one opportunity. It can analyze long documents, follow reusable skills, and get a team to a structured first draft.

The limits become clearer when several people are responding across multiple bids. Files live in different systems. Owners need assignments and deadlines. Reviewers need to know which source supports an answer without asking the model to explain itself after generation. The final response also has to return in the buyer’s format.

This is where purpose-built AI proposal software replaces a collection of manual handoffs. AutoRFP.ai drafts from approved sources, shows the evidence behind each answer, and routes anything it cannot support to a person. The team can collaborate on the response while keeping the review trail attached to the work.

The practical sequence stays the same:

  1. Load the right company and opportunity context.
  2. Decide whether to bid.
  3. Map the requirements and evaluation criteria.
  4. Agree on win themes.
  5. Draft from approved evidence and hand the gaps to people.

Claude can help you learn and run that sequence. The quality of the result still depends on the process around it and the evidence you provide.

About the author

Headshot of Rob Dickson

Rob Dickson

Ops Lead

Ops Lead at AutoRFP.ai. Designs the pipeline, content, and handoff systems bid teams use to run RFPs end-to-end, and co-hosts live sessions on winning workflows.

LinkedIn
    Share: